The Activated Leader™ | Issue #60

Hey {{first_name | default: friend}},

Picture this.

A Microsoft conference room. Midday.

I had just spent the better part of a week doing something most leaders will never do: going to every person on my team, one by one, and asking them directly: What isn't working?

Not in a survey. Not in a group meeting where everyone performs the safe version of honesty.

One by one. In person.

I had been told that the team didn't feel I was adding value. My manager had delivered the message with the practiced diplomacy of someone managing upward and downward at the same time. He softened the edges. He framed it carefully. He was kind.

And I had no idea what to actually do with it.

So I went to find out for myself.

The first person was warm. Supportive. Told me I was doing great. Said all the things a good colleague says when they want to protect the relationship and also have to see you every day.

Completely useless.

The second one stung. They gave me something specific, something with an address. I could actually do something with that one.

Then there was Brent.

Brent drove a Maserati to work. Brent questioned every decision leadership made, out loud, without apology, without apparent consequences. Brent killed his number every single quarter. You know the Brent in your organization. The one with so much credibility from results that no one can manage him into silence.

He looked at me and said:

"I'm going to call a spade a spade. You're in the wrong role. You shouldn't have gotten this job."

I smiled. Said thank you. Walked back to my desk.

And fell completely apart.

Why the feedback that would help you rarely reaches you

Here's what I now know about that week that I didn't know then.

What Brent gave me was rare because he was the only person in that building who wasn't filtering the truth before it got to me.

Every other person on that team ran my feedback through three invisible filters before they decided what to say:

Filter 1: What can I say without damaging what we have?

Most people trim the real thing down to something that won't cost them the relationship. By the time feedback reaches you, the sharpest edges are already gone.

Filter 2: What do I need from this person?

If someone needs your support, your approval, or your access, you will not get the full truth from them. You'll get the version designed to keep the door open. The feedback arrives wearing a different outfit than the one it left home in.

Filter 3: What do I think this person can handle?

This is the one most leaders never think about.

Before someone decides what to say to you, they decide who you are in their mind. If they've decided you're fragile, or defensive, or not ready, they calibrate to the version of you they're protecting.

Not the version actually sitting in the room.

Brent didn't run any of those filters. He had nothing to protect and nothing to prove. Which is exactly why what he said landed like it did.

And exactly why it was the most useful feedback anyone in that building gave me.

The three questions that changed what I did next

I almost quit that week.

If I'm honest, I sat at my desk and built the entire case for why Brent was wrong. I was good at that and I had been building cases for a long time.

But something made me stay in the room with it.

A coach I was working with at the time gave me three questions. I've since used them with every leader I work with who is sitting on hard feedback they don't know whether to trust or release.

Question 1: Is this person paying close attention, or are they paying a price?

Feedback from someone with nothing to gain from telling you the truth carries a different weight than feedback from someone managing their relationship with you. Brent wasn't managing anything. That matters.

Question 2: Does this feedback describe a pattern or a moment?

One bad quarter is a moment. A recurring observation from multiple people is a pattern. Before you dismiss hard feedback, ask whether you've heard a version of this before, even in softer packaging.

Question 3: If this is true, what would I do differently tomorrow?

Not "is it true"? That question keeps you in your head, arguing with the feedback instead of using it.

"If it's true, what would I do differently" moves you into action. The action reveals whether there's something real to work with.

I ran Brent's feedback through those three questions.

And I stopped trying to prove him wrong.

What happened after

I did not quit. I did not ignore what he said. I used it.

I spent the next quarter doing the work differently. Not performing competence. Building it.

Six months later, Brent was the first person on that team to recommend me for the next role.

Why? Because I stopped arguing with the truth he handed me and started doing something with it.

The feedback that almost ended my career became the foundation of everything I now teach.

But only because I learned to ask better questions about it.

{{first_name | default: friend}}, if you are sitting on feedback right now, a performance conversation you're replaying, a transition you're navigating, something someone said that you can't tell whether to trust or release, reply Feedback, and I will help you figure out what to do next.

My one ask of you this week:

Think about the last piece of hard feedback you received and didn't use.

Ask yourself, which filter did it get stuck in?

P.S. If this story is landing for you, forward it to someone who got hard feedback recently and doesn't know what to do with it. The person who most needs this is usually the one quietly deciding the feedback was wrong.

Work With Me

Executive Coaching

The Activated Leader Program
1:1 engagement for senior leaders navigating transition, identity, and what's next
➜ Explore coaching

Keynote Speaker

For conferences, leadership summits, and corporate off-sites
➜ Book Lilah